Slacking Off

photo by Ian Westcott

If you haven’t noticed already, I haven’t been posting as much on my blog lately.  Some of it has been because of a lack of inspiration – there isn’t as much to say now that both Alex and I have jobs and our own place – some is because I’ve got other stuff on my mind.  I missed my self-imposed deadline of June 1 for the new blog, and I’m not studying as much as I would like.  So, I’m going to focus a little more on those two things in an effort to keep moving forward. 

I’m not abandoning this blog, I just might only post once a week for a little while.  Hopefully, I won’t come back – tail tucked – and whine about things not working out.  You have my permission to fuss at me and stop reading if I do.

Panty-lines and titles: Be very, very careful

Photo by Malingering – with extra eww!

I was fiddling around on the internet, trying my best to find something to spark a new post, when I came across an article on The Frisky entitled “14 Celebrities with Underwear Lines.”  I clicked on it and was shocked at what it really was—celebrities who have their own brand of underwear.  I thought it would be celebrities with unsightly panty-lines.  Needless to say, I was sorely disappointed.

While the pictures of pretty people in pretty undergarments were nice (well, there was that one picture of Ricky Gervais in Ellen underwear, but even he wasn’t so bad), I was really hoping for some style no-nos that I could laugh at.  Though my brief vision of 70’s-style lines under double-knit slacks was destroyed, it nonetheless got me to thinking:

Was that title on purpose? 

Did the writer decide to capture those who look for the absurd as well as those who wish to drool over half-naked celebrity bodies?  I wouldn’t put it past the naughty minxes who run The Frisky, they’re pretty bold and usually funny to boot.  Or am I the only one who got that interpretation wrong?

It just goes to show that you should be very careful when titling or naming things and/or people.  A creative title can bring in a lot of readers who were looking for something different, but stick around to read your great article.  Of course, a creative title can bring in readers who aren’t interested in the actual content, potentially leading to some nasty comments.  I suppose the lesson here is to be very thoughtful when it comes to titling your article or naming in general. (Someday I shall list all the actual crazy names of real people I have run into, beginning with Rotunda and going downhill from there.)

So, if you’re titling your article on people trying to ride your donkey-drawn flower float, “Get Off My Pansy Ass Cart” you might think twice.  Or, hit “publish” immediately. 

Whatever works for you.

Do I blog for love or money?

Every blogger gets asked, “Why do you do it?”  D. Brent Rutyer, of the blog (and soon to be book) Memoirs of a Single Dad asked the question in the form of a little contest that’s really more about everyone sharing than winning anything.  The link to the contest is below:

http://www.memoirsofasingledad.com/2011/04/a-contest-for-bloggers-for-love-or-money/

So, here I go.

I started this blog for love and thought maybe some day there would be money involved.  I enjoy writing, I most certainly enjoy giving my opinion, and I wanted to let anyone else out there who has lost their way financially know that they are not alone, and they don’t have to be ashamed.  I figured if I could find ways of coping and working my way out of the mess I’d made, others may want to hear about it, or at least have a laugh at whatever craziness I encountered.

Later, I went to a blog conference, listened a lot, and talked with some people who make money from their blogs.  It seemed like a good idea; after all, I was spending a lot of time trying to write quality content that might be of interest to people, if only for a laugh.  That should count for something.  Plus, I was – and still am – short on cash.  A friend of mine once said to me, “You should never do anything that doesn’t make you money, especially in your situation.”  It sounds callous, but I understood what she meant.  Give too much away for free and no one will value what you do.  (And if you’ve lost your home and are living with relatives, you’d better be working to help, not hinder.)  After thinking about it a lot and trying to write something that could be monetized without alienating the small readership I have I’ve come to the conclusion that this blog will never be about money.  It’s just not set up for it.  Sure, I’ve got Google Ads on the site, but I doubt I’ll ever make enough for them to send that first $10 check.  I mainly did it to get my feet wet and because it makes the blog look more professional somehow. And that’s ok; it’s all about the journey.  It has always been about the journey.

I’m planning another blog for launch on June 1.  This one has some monetization built in from the beginning.  But I hesitate to say this one is about money, because it is also about something I love.  This time around, it just makes more sense to present the readers with products that might be of interest, both as a courtesy to them and a way to get a little compensation for me.  My expectations of riches are still very low, but it would be good if it paid for itself.

Considering the amount of time it takes to build a readership and all the competition out there for new blogs, I’d think you’d be insane to start one without at least a fondness for your subject.  Unless you’re a paid blogger for a site you didn’t create, it’s a pretty thankless job, at least in the beginning.  I’ve had – and will probably have – posts that got little notice despite the amount of work I put in them.  I’ve had days when almost no one visited my blog.  But I continue to write and I continue to care.

If that ain’t love, I don’t know what is.

Friends and NYT confirm:Good stuff on its way

My note, complete with doodle

I’ve got one of those “good things are afoot” feelings today.  As I have mentioned in passing more than once, I’m going to be launching a new blog soon.  Cold feet and my recent move have delayed it a little, but I’m shooting for a mid-May or maybe June 1 launch. It’s going to be a science fiction/fantasy book blog specifically for the female reader.  I’m calling it Scifi/Fantasy Divas.  I’m doing it because I looked around and really didn’t find a blog or site that fit with what I wanted to hear about.  There are several geek girl lifestyle sites, but I’m not really a gamer and a lot of the rest of the content seems to be about TV and film – which I like, don’t get me wrong, there just didn’t seem to be much about books.

My friends are being very supportive, and a couple of them in particular are also incredibly helpful and excited about the concept (which is when the panic set in; what if the blog stinks?) 

My reaction to the panic was to give my buddy Jill a call about getting the blog set up.  I had to do something, or I’d just set it aside out of fear.  The call went great – sure, about 75% was just us shooting the breeze, but we worked out a few things and Jill got some thoughts percolating in my head that will help me move forward.

Then today, the New York Times gave me even more incentive. 

I was noodling around on Twitter and saw a tweet from geek goddess, Felicia Day.  Apparently, the NYT had published something that offended her and her geeky sensibilities.  I clicked the link, which turned out to be an article about the upcoming HBO show, Game of Thrones, based on the George R. R. Martin series, A Song of Ice and Fire.  The journalist made an idle comment that HBO must have put the sex in the series so that women would watch it.  Because, of course, no woman would watch an old-school fantasy show.  She – yes, the journalist is a she – said she had “never met a single woman who has stood up in indignation at her book club and refused to read the latest from Lorrie Moore unless everyone agreed to The Hobbit first.”  Probably because any self-respecting scifi/fantasy diva has not only already read The Hobbit, she is aware of the stupid pigeonholing of the book as – in the journalist’s words – “boy fiction.”

Boy fiction?!

I’ve been reading science fiction and fantasy books since I was a little kid – I can trace the beginnings of my mania back to at least 10 years old.  Calling it boy fiction is a big, fat crock of dragon doo-doo.  On top of it all, I was actually talking to a coworker yesterday about A Song of Ice and Fire.  He was recommending it, and I wrote it down to check out because it sounded cool.  (You can see my scan of the note, above.)

If that isn’t a sign that I need to get things going, I don’t know what is.  Call it fate, kismet, or timing; I think I’m on to something here.

Oh yeah, here’s the link to the article: http://tv.nytimes.com/2011/04/15/arts/television/game-of-thrones-begins-sunday-on-hbo-review.html